<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Legal Executive</title>
    <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/</link>
    <description>Independent analysis of the CILEX profession: who is authorised, where they work, which firms employ them, and what the public register does and does not show.</description>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    <item>
      <title>A judge refused to hear a chartered legal executive who had the right to be heard</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/a-judge-refused-to-hear-them/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/a-judge-refused-to-hear-them/</guid>
      <description>On the best estimate this site can make, around 670 chartered legal executives do Court of Protection work. No CILEX authorisation mentions that court. When the regulator asked the court which of its authorisations applied, it waited five months to be told the answer was its own.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Six chartered legal executives can appear in the higher courts</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/six-higher-rights-advocates/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/six-higher-rights-advocates/</guid>
      <description>Against 18,153 barristers with full rights of audience, the CILEX register holds six people with higher rights — the earliest granted in April 2025, four of them this year. The regulator is creating categories faster than the profession fills them.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CILEX spent four years trying to hand its members to the SRA. Its own regulator called it unlawful</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/the-fight-over-who-regulates-them/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/the-fight-over-who-regulates-them/</guid>
      <description>Announced in 2022, formally signalled in 2024, abandoned in 2026. CILEx Regulation told its board the plan was unlawful and it was ready to litigate; the Legal Services Board convened peace talks to avoid &apos;costly legal action&apos;; members demanded a vote and were told a vote would be improper.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We called it a mirage. It was the biggest change to this profession in decades</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/the-mirage-was-real/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/the-mirage-was-real/</guid>
      <description>This site reported that 2026&apos;s ninefold rise in specialist practice rights was mostly re-labelling. It was not. 1,338 of those authorisations went to people who previously held nothing but the base qualification, and the cause is a judgment the regulator&apos;s own board papers describe as reshaping its year.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Specialist practice rights did not grow ninefold in 2026</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/2026-practice-rights-mirage/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/2026-practice-rights-mirage/</guid>
      <description>CORRECTED. This article said the 2026 growth in specialist practice rights was a re-badging exercise. It was not. The growth was real, and its cause was the Mazur judgment.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three in ten legal executives do not exist online</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/cilex-invisible-profession/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/cilex-invisible-profession/</guid>
      <description>We searched all 11,603 people on the CILEX registers by name and employer. 3,761 of them return nothing at all — and the ones who are easy to find are the ones who need finding least.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insurance defence, not the high street</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/firms-that-employ-them/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/firms-that-employ-them/</guid>
      <description>The largest employers of chartered legal executives are claims and insurance firms. But 58% of employers have exactly one, and that long tail is most of the profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The profession the Bar does not reach</title>
      <link>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/where-legal-executives-work/</link>
      <guid>https://thelegalexecutive.co.uk/analysis/where-legal-executives-work/</guid>
      <description>Wakefield has 70 chartered legal executives and one barrister. Southport has 50 and one. On the map, CILEX and the Bar are barely the same country.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>